Datum
Use case

Senior operators instead of a junior team

The short answer

Early and lean teams feel the data problem first and have the least capacity to fix it. Mapping a TAM, building scoring, wiring enrichment into the CRM, and standing up automations is a senior skill set — and reps already spend only about 28% of their week selling. Instead of onboarding several juniors who take months to ramp, you embed senior operators with 20+ years of combined GTM experience. Datum is that function on demand: we build and run the systems, so a small team operates like one with a full data and RevOps bench.

When you're lean, every hire is a bet. A junior RevOps or data hire is cheaper on paper but slow to ramp and easy to misdirect; a senior one is expensive and hard to find. Either way, while you decide, outbound runs on whatever a single tool happens to have.

Datum slots in as that capability without the headcount — senior people who've built this before, doing the sourcing, scoring, automation, and CRM work an in-house team would, scoped to what you actually need now.

This is you if…

  • Founder-led GTMThe founder is still running prospecting between everything else.
  • Tool sprawl, no systemYou're paying for three data tools and still copy-pasting between them.
  • Hiring is the bottleneckYou can't justify a senior RevOps hire yet, and juniors would need managing.

How we handle it

  1. 01We start with the smallest scope that produces scored pipeline, not a 12-month roadmap: capture the missing data, score what you have, wire the CRM.
  2. 02Everything we build is in your stack and documented, so when you do hire, they inherit a working system instead of a mystery — and we hand off cleanly.

Common questions

  • If you know who you sell to and have something to sell, you're not too early. We scope to your stage — for a lean team that often means one focused system, not a sprawling build.